Dark Tourism
Individuals have dependably gone to graveyards, war commemorations and different destinations tinged with catastrophe. Most circumstances this is viewed as a honest to goodness part of our verifiable training. All things considered, by what other method will we find out about history and maybe help it not rehash itself?
As of late however this sort of tourism has been given a name: dull tourism. It has equivalent words - despondency tourism, holocaust tourism, jail tourism - however they every one of the tend to share a relationship to fierce passing and include visits to places that have seen catastrophe.
There seems, by all accounts, to be a subset of dim tourism, known as fiasco tourism. While dim tourism has a tendency to allude to tragedies that are man-made, calamity tourism is typically used to single out spots hit by catastrophic events.
Dull tourism draws swarms. Mainstream locales include:
Nazi inhumane imprisonments in Europe, where millions kicked the bucket amid World War II
Ground Zero, where the World Trade Center twin structures once sat
air crash destinations, for example, Lockerbie
Cambodia's murdering fields
destinations where acclaimed individuals kicked the bucket, similar to the Paris burrow in which Princess Diana lost her life
burial grounds and dedications
Hiroshima, Nagasaki and different locales once assaulted by war.
Are these true blue sights for travelers? Or, then again is there some kind of problem with going to them?
Is this a suitable history lesson, or would we say we are enjoying reprehensible voyeurism?
The appropriate response appears to run generally contingent upon what we're seeing, how we feel about it, and to what extent back the disaster occurred. Appearing at the site of a noteworthy murder or air crash a day or two after it happens can unequivocally be considered voyeurism. It adds nothing to the circumstance or to our own insight, and can hurt the general population whose catastrophe it is - also hamper save or investigative endeavors.
Dim tourism is just the same old thing new and individuals have been going to these locales for quite a long time. Simply think about the a huge number of onlookers who assembled to watch the Roman fighters, or the swarmed town squares on the eve of an open execution. The constant flow of guests to previous inhumane imprisonments or war dedications are only two later cases of what most visitors consider legitimate destinations.But now, individuals are inquiring as to whether it's the correct thing to do.
Some portion of the choice on whether to go must be founded on time. To what extent has it been since the catastrophe occurred? Are survivors still there? Will your visit cause somebody torment? It is safe to say that you are simply rubbernecking, similar to individuals at the site of an auto collision?
Notwithstanding noting these inquiries won't really yield an answer with which everybody is agreeable.
Dim tourism isn't generally the aftereffect of dim thought processes, either. A recorded point of view on past offenses is regularly lighting up. Also, there can be monetary advantages: your visit and that of others may cause contribute monetarily to a discouraged territory. Your visit might be utilized to pay regards to the individuals who died at the site. What's more, on the off chance that you've been influenced by the disaster, however remotely, a visit can enable you to lament and mend.
On the other hand, there are reasons why you ought not enjoy dim tourism. Your essence might be driving individuals to remember a catastrophe they'd rather overlook. You can be seen - and with reason - as impolite and inhumane in the event that you've just come to ogle. Also, what you're doing may simply be ethically off-base.
Where do you take a stand? Is going to Dracula's Castle dull tourism? Frequented houses? What about Pearl Harbor? Or, on the other hand Inca ruins once utilized for human give up?
Likewise with many inquiries of good and bad, it's about inner voice. But at the same time it's an issue of utilization. On the off chance that a site is generally thought to be a satisfactory visitor site, odds are you'll be fine. However, in the event that you show up and you're the just a single there, reconsider. You might be at an unlucky spot.
Out Of Topic Show Konversi KodeHide Konversi Kode Show EmoticonHide Emoticon